State Courts and the Budget Crisis: Rethinking Court Services

نویسنده

  • Matthew Kleiman
چکیده

The Council of State Governments 289 Introduction The current fiscal crisis is provoking budget reductions so deep they threaten the basic mission of state courts. Massachusetts Chief Justice Margaret Marshall recently described the state courts, which handle 95 percent of all criminal and civil litigation in the country, as poised at “the tipping point of dysfunction.”1 In the 2010 fiscal year, 40 state court budgets were cut, and for the 2011 fiscal year, 48 project budget cuts. The cumulative cuts have reached as high as 20 percent of the court budget, and for many state courts, the end is not in sight. The scale of the problem is enormous. According to the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, overall state budget deficits for the 2010 fiscal year total $194 billion or 28 percent of state budgets—the largest gaps on record. Additional 2011 fiscal year gaps total $102 billion or 17 percent of budgets for the 41 states with budget gap estimates. These totals are likely to grow as state revenues continue to deteriorate, and may well exceed $180 billion.2 In addition to the macroeconomic factors driving the current recession, a growing demographic challenge is expected to persist for the next 15 years: fewer younger workers subsidizing through their taxes the retirements and social services of a large number of older workers. Put another way, income tax and payroll tax revenues are declining while social services and especially health care costs are escalating. State courts are funded in a variety of ways— either entirely through state budgets, through a combination of state and local funding, or entirely through local funding. For the 18 state court systems that are predominantly state-funded, the judicial branch budget represents only 2 to 4 percent of the state budget, most of which is devoted to personnel costs. Court budgets do not contain State Courts and the Budget Crisis: Rethinking Court Services By Richard Y. Schauffler and Matthew Kleiman

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Achieving High Performance: A Framework for Courts

The High Performance Court Framework suggests a series of flexible steps courts can take to integrate performance improvement into its ongoing operations. The steps include focusing on key administrative principles that clarify high performance, understanding how a court's managerial culture can promote common goals and collegial cooperation, developing the capacity to measure performance and l...

متن کامل

دخالت دادگاهها در رسیدگیهای داوری در حقوق ایران

  In case of existing a reliable agreement the courts do not have jurisdiction to consider the settlement of the case. So, the effect of arbitration agreement is to exclude the jurisdiction of state courts. The exclusion of court jurisdiction is not meant the absolute non-intervention in arbitration proceedings. Arbitration may not exist without a degree of court intervention. But, this interve...

متن کامل

Quasi-Judicial Authorities Investigating Violations in the Provision of Health Care Services

Patients are the main consumers of health care services and among the most vulnerable social classes. They are in a special situation because of the physical and emotional stresses caused by the illness as well as the financial burden of medical services. In contrast, the advancement, diversification and specialization of health care services have led patients to face a group called "health car...

متن کامل

The Oglala Sioux Tribal Court: From Termination to Self-Determination

In 1976, a study by the Judicial Services Division ofthe Bureau of Indian Affairs concluded that insufficient information is available on Indian tribal courts, suggesting that they have been largely ignored by historians and political scientists alike. By examining a specific court the Oglala Sioux Tribal Court a fuller understanding ofits vital role in the operation ofthe Pine Ridge Indian Res...

متن کامل

In Support of Reauthorization of Court Improvement Program

o Courts should adopt court performance measures to ensure that they can track cases, to increase accountability, and to inform decisions about the allocation of court resources; and o Incentives and requirements should be established for effective collaboration between courts and child welfare agencies on behalf of children in foster care; and o Children and parents should have a strong voice ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010